# Dr. Andrew Kaufman interviews former Pfizer analyst Karen Kingston: COVID-19 vaccines contain poisonous graphene

**URL:** <https://www.selvstyre.no/t/dr-andrew-kaufman-interviews-former-pfizer-analyst-karen-kingston-covid-19-vaccines-contain-poisonous-graphene/1732>\
**Category:** Korona\
**Created:** [august 6, 2021, 5:00pm UTC](https://www.selvstyre.no/t/dr-andrew-kaufman-interviews-former-pfizer-analyst-karen-kingston-covid-19-vaccines-contain-poisonous-graphene/1732 "2021-08-06T17:00:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Northern\_Light](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e47774/32.png) [@Northern\_Light](https://www.selvstyre.no/u/Northern_Light)\
**Post date:** [august 6, 2021, 5:00pm UTC](https://www.selvstyre.no/t/dr-andrew-kaufman-interviews-former-pfizer-analyst-karen-kingston-covid-19-vaccines-contain-poisonous-graphene/1732/1 "2021-08-06T17:00:58Z")

</div>

> **[BOMBSHELL: Pfizer Whistleblower Confirms Covid Injections are Poisonous...](https://www.infowars.com/posts/bombshell-pfizer-whistleblower-confirms-covid-injections-are-poisonous-bioweapons/)**
>
> Former Pfizer employee raises alarm over jab ingredients.

Dr. Andrew Kaufman hosts The Alex Jones Show with Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee and current analyst who confirms that the COVID-vaccines contain poisonous graphene.

_Video from 4th hour Infowars 08/04/2021_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thormothr](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/www.selvstyre.no/thormothr/32/15_2.png) [@thormothr](https://www.selvstyre.no/u/thormothr)\
**Post date:** [august 7, 2021, 11:18pm UTC](https://www.selvstyre.no/t/dr-andrew-kaufman-interviews-former-pfizer-analyst-karen-kingston-covid-19-vaccines-contain-poisonous-graphene/1732/2 "2021-08-07T23:18:07Z")

</div>

Some of Kingston’s claims are false, and they are refuted below.

**31:53**  
“…and they assumed a 1,6% infection rate over a period of 6 months, which would give them about 165-169 infected people in the placebo group, and I believe they got 10 or less in the vaccine group, and that would give them a 95% confident interval of reducing the risk of getting infected by 1% over 6 months. (…) …and what they concluded was that this is 95% effective in reducing the risk of getting COVID-19 by 1% for 1 week after the 2. injection…”  
**34:29**  
_“They tested at 1 week because too many people were getting sick in the treatment group, but worse than that, they had more people in the treatment-group presenting with COVID-19 symptoms than in the placebo-group, but they decided they ran out of time to test the people in the treatment-group, so they just tested the people in the placebo-group.”_

> **The FDA Review Memorandum for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine / BNT162b2 / Comirnaty**
> 
> [Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for an Unapproved Product  
> Review Memorandum](https://www.fda.gov/media/144416/download)
> 
> **page 6:**  
> “double-blinded” _[meaning the experimenters do not know who received the placebo]_  
> **page 16:**  
> “median follow-up time of 2 months after vaccination #2”  
> “As of November 14, 50,6% and 91,6% of vaccine recipients completed at least 2 months and at least 1 month, respectively, of safety follow-up after Dose 2”  
> **page 41:**  
> “Among 3,410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1,594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group. Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group. It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days postvaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19.”

> ## |Conclusion
> 
> Given that the data from the study are valid, in the individual median time of 2 months after Dose 2, the PCR-tests administered by the blinded experimenters showed
> 
> ## 9 suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases in vaccine group 169 suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases in placebo group.
> 
> …in addition, there was
> 
> ## 1.594 suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases in vaccine group (409 within 7 days of any vaccination) 1.816 suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases in placebo group (287 within 7 days of any vaccination)
> 
> _(I understand “unconfirmed” as “a negative PCR-test”)_

Personal note: I am critical of the short length of the study, of the validity of the PCR-test, and of only 2% of subjects being \>75 years. And it’s amusing that **0 of ~40.000 people** died of SARS during this half year study in the middle of a pandemic that supposedly requires an emergency experimental vaccine! However, conjuring facts is the opposite of clarifying.
