Fra Global Research.
Les hele artikkelen her.
Do we Know What’s inside the Pfizer Vaccine Vial?
The causes of vaccine related deaths and injuries have not been addressed by the health authorities.
What is inside the vaccine vial? National health authorities have not made public the results of their lab exams. It is unclear as to whether those lab exams of the vaccine vials have been conducted.
Below is a review of the analysis and laboratory research conducted by the independent Quinta Columna Spanish team.
Graphene Oxide Nano-particules.
According to lab exams conducted by the Spanish Quinta Columna research team, graphene oxide nano-particles have been detected in the vial of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine.
The results of their research (analysis by electron microscopy and spectroscopy) are far-reaching. Graphene oxide is a toxin which triggers thrombi and blood coagulation. It also has an impact on the immune system. Graphene oxide accumulated in the lungs can have devastating impacts.
Video: Interview with Ricardo Delgado Martin.
The results of the Spanish study, yet to be fully confirmed and ascertained , suggest that the recorded vaccine related deaths and “adverse events” (quoted above for the EU, UK and US) could be the result of graphene oxide nano-particles contained in the Covid vaccine vial.
This is a controversial study. There are scientists and medical doctors who disagree with the results of the Spanish study.
The evidence has to be either ascertained or refuted . What is required is that independent scientists and health professionals conduct their own lab analysis of the contents of the vaccine vial.
Similarly, we call upon the national health authorities of the 193 member states of the UN which are currently vaccinating their people, to conduct their own study and analysis of the vaccine vial. And if graphene-oxide is detected, the vaccination program should immediately be discontinued.
See summary of their report entitled Graphene Oxide Detection in Aqueous Suspension, Observational study in Optical and Electron Microscopy. Full Study (English).
Also of significance, (acknowledged by national health authorities) graphene oxide nano-particles are also contained in the face mask.
The Electromagnetic Properties of the mRNA Vaccine.
What is triggering the electromagnetic effects which have been detected in people who have been vaccinated?
These effects have been amply documented and confirmed by independent sources including those vaccinated. The national health authorities have failed to provide an explanation.
See the study conducted by the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance.
Below are two videos produced by the Spanish Research team at La Quinta Columna.
Video.
To watch the video below click HERE. (or screen below).
Video.
.
.
Concluding Remarks. The Vaccine Passport.
The data from official sources quoted above confirm unequivocally that the Covid-19 “vaccine” has resulted in an upward trend in vaccine related mortality and morbidity.
In turn, the studies of Dr. Charles Hoffe and the Spanish Research Team (Quinta Columna) which remain to be fully ascertained, point to possible “future impacts” of the vaccine on human health.
According to official data based on reported / registered deaths and injuries, there is no doubt: this is a “killer vaccine”.
So why are governments pressuring people to get vaccinated?.
Heads of State and heads of government Worldwide are being pressured, bribed, coopted and/or threatened by powerful financial interests into accepting the Covid vaccine consensus.
The vaccine passport is the endgame, which constitutes a transition towards digital tyranny.
At the time of writing, the vaccine passport has already been imposed in several countries including France and Italy.
.
In France, this was not an initiative of president Emmanuel Macron (it was imposed upon him). Macron is a political proxy acting on behalf of the financial and billionaire foundations. Macron is a former bank staff of the Rothschilds.
In turn, the Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi (former president of the European Central Bank) is an instrument of Goldman Sachs.
Bill Gates has play a key role. His foundation finances the WHO.
He has developed ties at a personal level with numerous heads of state and heads of government in all major regions of the World with a view to effectively carrying out this vaccine project.
.
The global capitalist elites control the so-called “classe politique”. The governments are liars.
From the very outset, the unspoken objective of the corona crisis (based on lies and deception) was to ultimately impose the contours of a Worldwide totalitarian regime, entitled “Global Governance” (by unelected officials). In the words of the late David Rockefeller:
“…The world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries .” (quoted by Aspen Times, August 15, 2011, emphasis added).
The Global Governance scenario imposes an agenda of social engineering and economic compliance.
The “intellectual elite” referred to by David Rockefeller is made up of numerous generously funded “scientists”, technocrats and “scholars” (e.g. Drosten, Neil Ferguson, et al) whose models and research findings have been used to justify the lockdown policies and the “killer vaccine”.
The mRNA vaccine should be halted and discontinued immediately Worldwide.
The Protest Movement. Bastille 2.0.
Acts of protest and resistance must question the legitimacy of both the financial architects of this crisis as well as the governments involved in imposing the vaccine:
The legitimacy of politicians and their powerful corporate sponsors must be questioned, including the police state measures adopted to enforce the closure of economic activity, the imposition of a digital vaccine passport as well as the wearing of the face mask, social distancing, etc.
This network must be established (nationally and internationally) at all levels of society, in towns and villages, work places, parishes. Trade unions, farmers organizations, professional associations, business associations, student unions, veterans associations, church groups would be called upon to integrate this movement.
The first task would be to disable the fear campaign and media disinformation as well put an end to Big Pharma’s Covid vaccination programme.
The corporate media should be directly challenged, without specifically targeting mainstream journalists, many of whom have been instructed to abide by the official narrative. This endeavour would require a parallel process at the grassroots level, of sensitizing and educating fellow citizens on the nature of virus, the impacts of the vaccine and the lockdown.
“Spreading the word” through social media and independent online media outlets will be undertaken bearing in mind that Google as well as Facebook are instruments of censorship.
The creation of such a movement, which forcefully challenges the legitimacy of the financial elites as well as the structures of political authority at the national level, is no easy task. *It will require a degree of solidarity, unity and commitment unparalleled in World history’.
It will also require breaking down political and ideological barriers within society (i.e. between political parties) and acting with a single voice.
We must also understand that the “corona project” is an integral part of the U.S. imperial agenda. It has geopolitical and strategic implications. It will also require eventually unseating the architects of this diabolical “pandemic” and indicting them for crimes against humanity. (Michel Chossudovsky, December 2020. With some minor changes).
In the words of Doctors for Covid Ethics:
“The Gene-based “Vaccines” are Killing People. Governments Worldwide Are Lying to You the People, to the Populations They Purportedly Serve”.
About the Author.
.
Michel Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics (emeritus) at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal, Editor of Global Research.
He has undertaken field research in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and the Pacific and has written extensively on the economies of developing countries with a focus on poverty and social inequality. He has also undertaken research in Health Economics (UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), UNFPA, CIDA, WHO, Government of Venezuela, John Hopkins International Journal of Health Services (1979, 1983).
He is the author of twelve books including The Globalization of Poverty and The New World Order (2003), America’s “War on Terrorism” (2005), The Globalization of War, America’s Long War against Humanity (2015).
He is a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. His writings have been published in more than twenty languages. In 2014, he was awarded the Gold Medal for Merit of the Republic of Serbia for his writings on NATO’s war of aggression against Yugoslavia. He can be reached at crgeditor@yahoo.com.
See Michel Chossudovsky, Biographical Note.
Michel Chossudovsky’s Articles on Global Research.
APPENDIX.
Below are details on the three main criteria outlined at the outset of this article which are used to uphold the official narrative as well as justify the implementation of a Worldwide vaccination program with a view to saving lives.
1. there is no killer virus.
2. the measurement of covid positive cases is invalid.
3. the Covid-19 mortality data is manipulated.
Much of the analysis and statements below are contained in Chapter III of Michel Chossudovsky’s E-Book entitled.
As well in an article entitled.
1. There is No Killer Virus.
SARS-CoV-2 is presented and upheld as “a killer virus” . That’s the cornerstone of the 24/7 fear and media disinformation campaign upheld by persistent statements by politicians and national health authorities.
It is a killer virus? Both the peer-reviewed as well the WHO, CDC “official” definitions of SARS-CoV-2 say exactly the opposite. Their definitions of SARS-2 repeal their own lies.
.
Screenshot The Hill, March 19, 2020.
Lies through omission: the media has failed to reassure the broader public.
Below is the official WHO definition of Covid-19:.
Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses which may cause illness in animals or humans. In humans, several coronaviruses are known to cause respiratory infections ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). The most recently discovered coronavirus causes coronavirus disease COVID-19.
“The most common symptoms of COVID-19 are fever, dry cough, and tiredness. … These symptoms are usually mild and begin gradually. Some people become infected but only have very mild symptoms . Most people (about 80%) recover from the disease without needing hospital treatment. Around 1 out of every 5 people who gets COVID-19 becomes seriously ill and develops difficulty breathing".
According to Anthony Fauci (Head of NIAID), H. Clifford Lane and Robert R. Redfield (Head of CDC) in the New England Journal of Medicine .
“…the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1% ) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively".
Dr. Anthony Fauci is lying to himself. In his public statements he says that Covid is “Ten Times Worse than Seasonal Flu”..
He refutes his peer reviewed report quoted above. From the outset, Fauci has been instrumental in waging the fear and panic campaign across America:
.
.
Screenshot The Hill, March 19, 2020.
Covid-19 versus Influenza (Flu) Virus A and Virus B (and subtypes) ( Bear in mind seasonal influenza is not a coronavirus).
Rarely mentioned by the media or by politicians: The CDC (which is an agency of the US government) confirms that Covid-19 is similar to Influenza.
“Influenza (Flu) and COVID-19 are both contagious respiratory illnesses, but they are caused by different viruses . COVID-19 is caused by infection with a new coronavirus (called SARS-CoV-2) and flu is caused by infection with influenza viruses. Because some of the symptoms of flu and COVID-19 are similar, it may be hard to tell the difference between them based on symptoms alone, and testing may be needed to help confirm a diagnosis. Flu and COVID-19 share many characteristics, but there are some key differences between the two.”
If the public had been informed and reassured that Covid is “similar to Influenza”, the fear campaign would have fallen flat.
2. The Measurement of Covid Positive Cases is Invalid.
We are told that there is a pandemic characterized by a rising Worldwide trend of Covid-19 infection. This alleged trend is said to be corroborated by a rapidly increasing number of covid positive cases.
The methodology used to generate these figures is dependent upon the WHO sponsored Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) test, the estimates of which are tabulated Worldwide by the national health authorities.
While the estimates of the rRT-PCR have been questioned from the very outset, it is now confirmed beyond doubt that the rRT-PCR test adopted as a means to detecting the SARS-COV-2 virus cases is TOTALLY invalid.
(This pertains to Covid positive data tabulated since late January 2020).
The Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) test was adopted by the WHO on January 23, 2020 as a means to detecting the SARS-COV-2 virus, following the recommendations of a Virology research group (based at Charité University Hospital, Berlin), supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (For Further details see the Drosten Study)
Exactly one year later on January 20th, 2021, the WHO retracts. They don’t say “We Made a Mistake”. The retraction is carefully formulated. (See original WHO document here).
While the WHO does not deny the validity of their misleading January 2020 guidelines, they nonetheless recommend “ R e-testing” (which everybody knows is an impossibility).
The contentious issue pertains to the number of amplification threshold cycles (Ct). According to Pieter Borger, et al.
The number of amplification cycles [should be] less than 35; preferably 25-30 cycles. In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture…(Critique of Drosten Study).
The World Health Organization (WHO) tacitly admits one year later that ALL PCR tests conducted at a 35 cycle amplification threshold (Ct) or higher are INVALID. But that is what they recommended in January 2020, in consultation with the virology team at Charité Hospital in Berlin.
If the test is conducted at a 35 Ct threshold or above (which was recommended by the WHO), segments of the SARS-CoV-2 virus cannot be detected, which means that ALL the so-called confirmed “positive cases” tabulated in the course of the last 14 months are invalid.
According to Pieter Borger, Bobby Rajesh Malhotra, Michael Yeadon, et al, the Ct > 35 has been the norm “in most laboratories in Europe & the US”.
The WHO’s Mea Culpa.
Below is the WHO’s carefully formulated “Retraction”. The full text with link to the original document is in annex:
WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed ( 1 ). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology. (emphasis added).
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases ( 2 ). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
“Invalid Positives” is the Underlying Concept.
This is not an issue of “Weak Positives” and “Risk of False Positive Increases”. What is at stake is a “Flawed Methodology” which leads to invalid estimates.
What this admission of the WHO confirms is that the estimate of covid positive from a PCR test (with an amplification threshold of 35 cycles or higher) is invalid . In which case, the WHO recommends retesting: “a new specimen should be taken and retested…”.
The WHO calls for “Retesting”, which is tantamount to “We Screwed Up”.
That recommendation is pro-forma. It won’t happen. Millions of people Worldwide have already been tested, starting in early February 2020. Nonetheless, we must conclude that unless retested, those estimates (according to the WHO) are invalid.
The WHO Confirms that the Covid-19 PCR Test is Flawed: Estimates of “Positive Cases” are Meaningless. The Lockdown Has No Scientific Basis By Prof Michel Chossudovsky.
Another issue which has bearing on the Validity of the rTC-PCR test is that the SARS-1, (2003) was used in the PCR-test as a proxy for SARS-COV-2, because no information was available pertaining to the “isolation” and “identity” of SAR-CoV-2. This was recommended to the WHO on the grounds that the genetic fragments of SARS-1 are similar to those of SARS-CoV-2.
What it also implies is that statement regarding “variants” and mutations pertaining to SARS-CoV-2 are totally meaningless inasmuch as the PCR test from the outset included a similar 2003 virus as a proxy for SARS-CoV-2. i.e. mutations in relation to what? SARS-2 or SARS-Co-2 (the identity of which has not been made public.
The RT-PCR data cannot under any circumstances be used to justify the imposition of a vaccine, which is presented to public opinion as a means to saving lives, when in fact it is leading to an upward trend in vaccine related mortality and morbidity.
3. T he Covid-19 Mortality Data is Manipulated.
We are told that there is a rising trend of Covid-19 mortality, namely deaths which are allegedly the result of SARS-2 viral infection.
There is ample evidence that these Covid-19 related “probable” causes of death and the underlying data on Covid-19 mortality are manipulated by the national health authorities.
In the US, the mortality statistics pertaining to Covid-19 are TOTALLY invalid.
The “More Often than Not” Clause.
On March 21, 2020 the following specific guidelines were introduced by the CDC regarding Death Certificates (and their tabulation in the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS). The instructions to the certifiers are to identify COVID-19 as the “Underlying Cause of Death” “More Often Than Not”.
Will COVID-19 be the underlying cause of death? This concept is fundamental. The underlying cause of death is defined by the WHO as “the disease or injury that initiated the train of events leading directly to death” ****.
What the CDC is recommending with regards to statistical coding and categorization is that COVID-19 is expected to be the underlying cause of death “more often than not".
The CDC combines these two criteria. “underlying cause of death”, more often than not.
The above directive is categorical. Below are CDC concepts and justifications.
“The underlying cause depends upon what and where conditions are reported on the death certificate. However, the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID- 19 being the underlying cause more often than not".
.
The certifier cannot depart from the CDC criteria. Covid-19 is imposed. Read carefully the CDC criteria above:.
“What happens if certifiers report terms other than the suggested terms"?.
There are no loopholes. These CDC directives have contributed to categorizing Covid-19 as the recorded “cause of death”. Two fundamental concepts prevail throughout:
The “underlying cause of death”.
The “More Often than Not” Clause which falsifies the Cause of Death.
And these criteria are imposed despite the fact that the RT-PCR test used to corroborate the “cause of death” provides misleading results".